Abortion

2»

Comments

  • SLIMSLIM Regular
    edited October 2010
    Hey, sanchez; would you support abortion in non-white areas?
  • DirtySanchezDirtySanchez Regular
    edited October 2010
    SLIM wrote: »
    Hey, sanchez; would you support abortion in non-white areas?

    Yes. I'd support forced abortion for non whites if that was possible.
  • SLIMSLIM Regular
    edited October 2010
    Yes. I'd support forced abortion for non whites if that was possible.
    I wouldn't say force it, you've got to be tactical about it with an issue like this.

    Very little abortion should be tolerated, among the White race, while at the same time, abortion and birth control should be promoted for the limitation of non-White birth.

    At the end of it, it should be the absolute choice of the individual.


    I'd be on both sides of the fence at demonstrations, the pro-life side being "Support white life"/ "stop white genocide" and on the pro-abortion side being "Minorities Have Abortion Rights" or something to that effect. The word "rights" makes non-white women greasy in the panties.

    Among non-Whites, invest in ghetto abortion clinics. Help to raise money for free abortions and support the clinics operating in non-white areas.

    The brown and black races are boiling over in every non-White country. There is no shortage of non-White people.


    So you can force them to do something, but naturally they'll fight back. The choice needs to be up to the individual and they need to want to do it themselves. Fight the same way our enemies do, and use psychology.


    This has nothing to do with religion, merely a tactical opinion in cutting down on non-whites and advancing the white population.


    As for white people it should be questioned, but still entirely upto the individual. Does the pregnant woman or her family suffer if she does not have the abortion, shouldn't the mother's well developed nervous system have a choice, since the embryo lacks a nervous system?

    Even so, if it's old enough to have a nervous system it suffers less than an adult cow in a slaughterhouse.


    Before I debate abortion (I'm pro-choice) any further, can I just ask if you are in support of In Vitro Fertilization?
  • DirtySanchezDirtySanchez Regular
    edited October 2010
    Yeah I support In Vitro Fertilization. I always thought it was stupid that some Christians seem to think it's wrong somehow.
  • SLIMSLIM Regular
    edited October 2010
    Yeah I support In Vitro Fertilization. I always thought it was stupid that some Christians seem to think it's wrong somehow.

    As many as a dozen zygotes may be produced, of which 2 or 3 are then implanted in the uterus. Of these only 1 or possibly 2 will survive, IVF kills conceptuses at 2 stages of the procedure. So why do you have a double standard for "murder" here?
  • edited October 2010
    SLIM wrote: »
    I wouldn't say force it, you've got to be tactical about it with an issue like this.

    Very little abortion should be tolerated, among the White race, while at the same time, abortion and birth control should be promoted for the limitation of non-White birth.

    At the end of it, it should be the absolute choice of the individual.


    I'd be on both sides of the fence at demonstrations, the pro-life side being "Support white life"/ "stop white genocide" and on the pro-abortion side being "Minorities Have Abortion Rights" or something to that effect. The word "rights" makes non-white women greasy in the panties.

    Among non-Whites, invest in ghetto abortion clinics. Help to raise money for free abortions and support the clinics operating in non-white areas.

    The brown and black races are boiling over in every non-White country. There is no shortage of non-White people.


    So you can force them to do something, but naturally they'll fight back. The choice needs to be up to the individual and they need to want to do it themselves. Fight the same way our enemies do, and use psychology.


    This has nothing to do with religion, merely a tactical opinion in cutting down on non-whites and advancing the white population.


    As for white people it should be questioned, but still entirely upto the individual. Does the pregnant woman or her family suffer if she does not have the abortion, shouldn't the mother's well developed nervous system have a choice, since the embryo lacks a nervous system?

    Even so, if it's old enough to have a nervous system it suffers less than an adult cow in a slaughterhouse.


    Before I debate abortion (I'm pro-choice) any further, can I just ask if you are in support of In Vitro Fertilization?

    I find it hugely ironic that you are a white supremacist, as you are the best argument against white supremacy because you act like a nigger.
  • SLIMSLIM Regular
    edited October 2010
    I find it hugely ironic that you are a white supremacist, as you are the best argument against white supremacy because you act like a nigger.

    * white separatist
  • edited October 2010
    SLIM wrote: »
    * white separatist

    You are an argument for black supremacy and for the genocide of the white race. You are an embarrassment to decent whites everywhere, and if you were killed by a nigger I'd give him a medal and send him a Christmas card every year.
  • DirtySanchezDirtySanchez Regular
    edited October 2010
    Normally I'd say we should get back on topic but this is too entertaining.
  • SLIMSLIM Regular
    edited October 2010
    You are an embarrassment to decent whites .

    This is funny coming from you.

    Just out of curiosity, what do you define as "decent"?
  • DirtySanchezDirtySanchez Regular
    edited October 2010
    SLIM wrote: »

    Just out of curiosity, what do you define as "decent"?

    Someone who isnt an anarchist:o:o:o.
  • edited October 2010
    SLIM wrote: »
    This is funny coming from you.

    Just out of curiosity, what do you define as "decent"?

    In fairness I suppose it's hard to expect much more than you from a 15 year old.
  • SLIMSLIM Regular
    edited October 2010
    In fairness I suppose it's hard to expect much more than you from a 15 year old.

    Do you have an answer to the question?
  • edited October 2010
    SLIM wrote: »
    Do you have an answer to the question?

    A decent white grows behind the fifteen year old feelings of being the toughest thing on the face of the Earth. A decent white understands he may be self reliant, but he is still a part of a whole. What do you think separates the forward thinking white race from the mud races? Why is it that only Whites, Jews, and Asians are able to create effective and advanced societies?
  • SLIMSLIM Regular
    edited October 2010
    A decent white understands he may be self reliant, but he is still a part of a whole. What do you think separates the forward thinking white race from the mud races? Why is it that only Whites, Jews, and Asians are able to create effective and advanced societies?

    And I actually agree with you there, I only advocate illegalism towards the enemies and traitorous whites (I know you're definitely not under the delusion that all whites are amazing), and most other NAs I know stick to the same principle of supporting their own people, friends and family. It is still of my opinion that one person's good is not necessarily another person's good. Neither morals, laws, nor creeds are First Principles, but they have their use for the casting off of lower organisms (gentiles), for extirpating individuals of low self-determination and inability to think and fight for themselves and their family and their people. Indeed the secret object of all superstitions possibly is, to provide an ultra-rational sanction for fraudulent standards of Right and Wrong.

    Each individual should think as they please, without the least respect for what others think or do, only being limited to his actions by the materialized opposition he actually meets with and the limits of their genetics; for the strong are the natural limit of the Strong. No one has hooks in their ass to stop them from their natural instincts or to obey any authority figure (or a majority); except the authoritarian can force obedience. We owe no allegiance whatever to these authority figures because self-preservation is the first law of nature and freedom is harmonious with this.


    Might is Right but Might is not always correct. We have not been on the side of the victorious for a while as most racists know it and therefore our enemy is currently the Might in "Might is Right".

    To gain back the might in the MIR equation we must use both the power of the mind and of the fist in combination. One will not work without the other.

    No nation, nor has any race ever been enslaved, because it took part in manly sports - in the hunting of boars and lions, and men - in deadly tournaments - in dueling - in prize fighting - in gladiatorial combats — in scenes of ‘cruelty and blood.’ Not a single nation. But dozens of ‘civilizations’ have perished shamefully, because of the spreading of cowardice and suppression gendered by effeminacy, luxury, usury, laboriousness, statecraft, superstition, and peace.


    The reason jews are succesful is because they realize might makes right, you only have to take a look in the talmud to see their MIR attitude.
  • DirtySanchezDirtySanchez Regular
    edited October 2010
    ^^^ In that way we need to be more like the zionists. Instead of a ballot though we should use bullets and bombs. It's like McVeigh said the only way people will take notice is with a body count. The problem is that there aren't enough who think that way to make a realistic change possible. Sure shoot Obama or something but then another ZOG puppet will take his place.

    This leaves a serious question. What can be done to change this attitude that violence is never the answer? That's what racialists need to focus on is how to make the movement more militant. Words can only do so much. A wise man once said that whoever said the pen is more powerful then the sword obviously never encountered automatic gunfire. So the focus needs to turn more on how to get the movement more militant and less on winning over minds.

    If the whole existing pro white movement were to take up arms and risk there life then there would be no stopping it. Look at 9/11. Look what 13 men with boxcutters were able to accomplish. Sure I believe in God but fuck pacifism and peace. Our race is at war whether we know it or not and all is fair in war.
  • SLIMSLIM Regular
    edited October 2010
    What can be done to change this attitude that violence is never the answer?

    A good start would be dropping christianity, it truly is an unnatural poison of the mind. Even when one follows christian identity they are adopting a form of Judaism, jew think and mythical fairy tales which all have their origins in pre-existing pagan religions, mainly in Egyptian paganism. The only difference being, the talmud and torah bought the jews together, christianity also a jewish invention was forced upon the white race and has done NO GOOD whatsoever for the white race ever since.

    The government as we know it today and political correctness has its origins in religion. The church and state would find it very hard to exist without each other. The majority of white peoples' "morals" are rooted in the flabby meekness that is Paulianity.


    "If god did exist, it would be necessary to abolish him."
    - Mikhail Bakunin, God and the state


    Honestly I have seen CI pastors preach that we don't need to do anything and it will be fought on Yahweh's time :rolleyes:

    I also see you have put Resist in your sig. Enough time spent reading through that site in just the news and views will give people enough reason to turn into a proud white racist. I like the lone wolf and cell organization tactics Tom Metzger proposes, also.
Sign In or Register to comment.