My Firefox process is currently using about 200MB of RAM, which I suppose isn't too bad. After all, I've seen MUCH worse from one of the Firefox releases, which pretty much raped the fuck out of everyone's memory. They released a patch the very next day though, which was very nice of them! I'm loving FF4 to be honest - it's fast and responsive, looks great, and all my addons work! And with 4GB of RAM, I'm not complaining about the mere 200MB which it's taking up right now.
We wouldn't have such a big fucking problem if everyone would run a damn x64 operating system so software can all be developed on the 64 bit platform. Memory issues and 16-32GB DDR sticks would be plentiful.
We wouldn't have such a big fucking problem if everyone would run a damn x64 operating system so software can all be developed on the 64 bit platform. Memory issues and 16-32GB DDR sticks would be plentiful.
^This,
It would be awesome if Firefox was 64bit enabled. I currently have 4GB of RAM [Downgraded from 6GB due to memory errors FML] and I don't mind if some application takes 2+GB but I don't expect that from a fucking browser with half the Add-ons disabled already.
We wouldn't have such a big fucking problem if everyone would run a damn x64 operating system so software can all be developed on the 64 bit platform. Memory issues and 16-32GB DDR sticks would be plentiful.
^This,
It would be awesome if Firefox was 64bit enabled. I currently have 4GB of RAM [Downgraded from 6GB due to memory errors FML] and I don't mind if some application takes 2+GB but I don't expect that from a fucking browser with half the Add-ons disabled already.
It would be awesome if Firefox was 64bit enabled. I currently have 4GB of RAM [Downgraded from 6GB due to memory errors FML] and I don't mind if some application takes 2+GB but I don't expect that from a fucking browser with half the Add-ons disabled already.
64 bit Firefox has been available for quite some time.
It's not fully 64 bit though, no browser out there was built from the ground up as 64 bit but merely with added 64 bit instructions in the code really to only add support for a 32 bit program on a 64 bit operating system. It takes absolutely no advantage of the 64 bit architecture, nor is it even remotely close to a true 64 bit software.
You really have to look into software that says x64 because what most are REALLY meaning is "this software is meant to run on 64 bit operating systems but was developed for 32 bit ones". Cross platform compatibility if you wan to be high speed when telling people.
Dfg
Admin
Comments
And fastest fox works on FF4
Overall, I don't say fuck you to FF!
about:memory
^This,
It would be awesome if Firefox was 64bit enabled. I currently have 4GB of RAM [Downgraded from 6GB due to memory errors FML] and I don't mind if some application takes 2+GB but I don't expect that from a fucking browser with half the Add-ons disabled already.
^This,
It would be awesome if Firefox was 64bit enabled. I currently have 4GB of RAM [Downgraded from 6GB due to memory errors FML] and I don't mind if some application takes 2+GB but I don't expect that from a fucking browser with half the Add-ons disabled already.
64 bit Firefox has been available for quite some time.
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla-central/
It's not fully 64 bit though, no browser out there was built from the ground up as 64 bit but merely with added 64 bit instructions in the code really to only add support for a 32 bit program on a 64 bit operating system. It takes absolutely no advantage of the 64 bit architecture, nor is it even remotely close to a true 64 bit software.
You really have to look into software that says x64 because what most are REALLY meaning is "this software is meant to run on 64 bit operating systems but was developed for 32 bit ones". Cross platform compatibility if you wan to be high speed when telling people.
You mean 5?
Dunno
Erm yes, 5.
<<blind