You missed out the part about other races being completely "superior" to others, which my definition does not include, yours does so it is not "exactly as you said it was." Example, whites are intellectually superior to negroes, yet negroes are in some areas athletically superior to whites (running). I believe each race can achieve its full and different potential by being separate from each other, forced integration (multiculturalism) is unfair for all parties involved. I'm sorry, but you don't get to brush off your ignorance as "having fun." Stop being such a leftist for atleast a little while and take some responsibility and admit you were wrong
Hahaha, the image that comes to mind when I read your posts fits SO perfectly with your physiognomy. I find it astounding.
Ok I get it, my bad I exaggerated. Your views differ slightly from the given definition. It still included your definition in part. So your a 'racialist' not a 'racist'. Brilliant.
I even agree with you in part..'Example, whites are intellectually superior to negroes, yet negroes are in some areas athletically superior to whites (running).' I won't dispute that. Every race has different attributes, nobody should dispute that. I do think the rest of your stance is debatable though.
This isn't about my 'irony,' it's about your idiocy. I personally see nothing ironic about anything I've said. Excuse me if it seems I sometimes retort in a hostile manner to both you and skunk, who have referred to me as "ugly" and a "fucking moron." I won't be kind when I call you out on your unwarranted hostility and ignorance.
You haven't noticed the irony of your posts? Hah! Why did this not surprise me? Interesting to note, even. I wondered if you would... If you truly want I will quote it and spell it out for you , but I am too tired right now and it will make this a much larger post...
Now it's my turn...Excuse me if I don't enjoy your patronizing, condescending, self-conceited (I could go on) posts. I won't be kind when I...blah blah, yeah, that's not me. You sound like a douche. No offense :hai:
I don't throw a hissy fit about anything you do, I just think you're an idiot.
Likewise :thumbsup:
EDIT: And my bad if I sometimes like to poke people like you with a stick every now and then. I find the reactions entertaining...Damn I need some sleep.
It hardly ever applies really. That's why I'm so astounded this time. I never said anything about it being applicable to every person, so its not an entirely reasonable question is it?
EDIT: I thought it was a funny question, given the thread. So I posted what I thought was an on topic response...I will refrain from any and all humorous/facetious activity from now on :thumbsup:
It hardly ever applies really. That's why I'm so astounded this time. I never said anything about it being applicable to every person, so its not an entirely reasonable question is it?
Apart from using it to assess Negrophobe, you never said anything about its general applicability at all; an enquiry about physiognomy's usage with regard to nigger-identification, given that niggers are the subject of this thread, is therefore entirely reasonable.
EDIT: I thought it was a funny question, given the thread. So I posted what I thought was an on topic response...I will refrain from any and all humorous/facetious activity from now on :thumbsup:
Your physiognomy-based sense of humour wearing thin now that it's occured to you that some black people bear a strong resemblance to great apes, relative to white people?
Apart from using it to assess Negrophobe, you never said anything about its general applicability at all; an enquiry about physiognomy's usage with regard to nigger-identification, given that niggers are the subject of this thread, is therefore entirely reasonable.
Honestly, I didn't think people would assume I think its 'generally applicable' from a single post I made concerning one person only...Good reasoning/assuming abilities, but you are assuming too much and are simply off the mark.
I guess we disagree on what we find reasonable. If I did hold the view and had stated that it was 'generally applicable', or at least made the claim more than once about more than one person, and shit, if this wasn't totse of all places, then I would agree it is perfectly reasonable...But as it stands, I haven't. I've even explained this already. Keep picking at what I said though, by all means.
Your physiognomy-based sense of humour wearing thin now that it's occured to you that some black people bear a strong resemblance to great apes, relative to white people?
Haha, I think you are taking this all a bit seriously/literally. My 'physiognomy-based sense of humour' isn't wearing thin at all in regard to negrophobe. I get an interesting and hilarious mental image when I link his picture to his posts. The part about 'suggesting stupidity, bigotry, ugliness etc' was just a crude troll to see what would happen. Call it a personal experiment. I also had a few of those opinions of him before seeing his picture, which inspired the post in the first place, aside from his amusing response to me calling him 'ugly'. For once somebody on totse actually looks like I imagined :eek:
If you had any idea you would realize I rarely ever get kicks out of 'physiognomy-based humour'. You are assuming way too much on my behalf and in the vein of negrophobe, 'doing yourself no favours'. Hope this cleared up some of your confusion :thumbsup:
Do you think you could spot the niggers in a crowd of black people?
And for the sake of this thread, no I couldn't. To my understanding the widely acceptable definition of a nigger is a derogatory term toward black people... .
Yeah, I could probably pick out at least some of the niggers in a crowd of black people presuming you define nigger along some such lines as a 'debased, ignorant, or very low person' (crack heads aren't too hard to spot)...Or like how a nigger is portrayed in a show such as 'The Boondocks'...But this is delving into semantics. If you really care about my opinion on this feel free to post a more accurate definition. As I'm sure you're aware, definitions concerning nigger can differ rather dramatically depending on who you are talking to. Much like the word 'racist', as we've found out
Apart from using it to assess Negrophobe, you never said anything about its general applicabilityat all; an enquiry about physiognomy's usage with regard to nigger-identification, given that niggers are the subject of this thread, is therefore entirely reasonable.
Honestly, I didn't think people would assume I think its 'generally applicable' from a single post I made concerning one person only...Good reasoning/assuming abilities, but you are assuming too much and are simply off the mark.
I guess we disagree on what we find reasonable. If I did hold the view and had stated that it was 'generally applicable', or at least made the claim more than once about more than one person, and shit, if this wasn't totse of all places, then I would agree it is perfectly reasonable...But as it stands, I haven't. I've even explained this already. Keep picking at what I said though, by all means.
I created a valid question in attempt to clarify your position precisely because I didn't make an assumption.
Your physiognomy-based sense of humour wearing thin now that it's occured to you that some black people bear a strong resemblance to great apes, relative to white people?
Haha, I think you are taking this all a bit seriously/literally. My 'physiognomy-based sense of humour' isn't wearing thin at all in regard to negrophobe. I get an interesting and hilarious mental image when I link his picture to his posts. [/b]The part about 'suggesting stupidity, bigotry, ugliness etc' was just a crude troll to see what would happen. Call it a personal experiment. I also had a few of those opinions of him before seeing his picture, which inspired the post in the first place, aside from his amusing response to me calling him 'ugly'. For once somebody on totse actually looks like I imagined :eek:
If you had any idea you would realize I rarely ever get kicks out of 'physiognomy-based humour'. You are assuming way too much on my behalf and in the vein of negrophobe, 'doing yourself no favours'. Hope this cleared up some of your confusion :thumbsup:
The strawman accusation of 'too much assumption' has been dealt with. As for doing one's self favours your sloppy condescension of Negrophobe has hardly been impressive.
And for the sake of this thread, no I couldn't. To my understanding the widely acceptable definition of a nigger is a derogatory term toward black people... .
Yeah, I could probably pick out at least some of the niggers in a crowd of black people presuming you define nigger along some such lines as a 'debased, ignorant, or very low person' (crack heads aren't too hard to spot)...Or like how a nigger is portrayed in a show such as 'The Boondocks'...But this is delving into semantics. If you really care about my opinion on this feel free to post a more accurate definition. As I'm sure you're aware, definitions concerning nigger can differ rather dramatically depending on who you are talking to. Much like the word 'racist', as we've found out
Given the prevalence of inverted racism that plagues self-loathing liberals 'no such thing as niggers[insert semantics], but I can spot a white racist bigot', trolling, and in this case haughty moral condescension, is an ideal get-out clause to escape from liberal hypocrisy.
I created a valid question in attempt to clarify your position precisely because I didn't make an assumption.
Nice strawman.
Seems I misinterpreted the tone of your posts. I wasn't trying to create a strawman. Sounded to me like you had the wrong impression.
I get it now, you were trying to clarify my position by asking a question, albeit a rather ambiguous one given the overall tone of the thread. I didn't think you were being serious. Is it so hard to just be direct and ask if I meant my statement as being 'generally applicable'? Or if it it was applicable to black people/niggers? Or even if you had posted your definition of 'nigger' because you obviously meant it as a separate term to black people. Would've saved us both some time.
The strawman accusation of 'too much assumption' has been dealt with. As for doing one's self favours your sloppy condescension of Negrophobe has hardly been impressive.
As I already said, I'm not trying to do myself a 'favour' or even impress anybody. This is an internet forum, I actually have better things to do than impress/win approval from people here :eek: I post here because it amuses me when I have some spare time and occasionally I learn something.
I found the 'favour' remark funny when negrophobe used it as if I cared about what people on an internet forum think of me. So I found it amusing to use again.
Given the prevalence of inverted racism that plagues self-loathing liberals 'no such thing as niggers[insert semantics], but I can spot a white racist bigot', trolling, and in this case haughty moral condescension, is an ideal get-out clause to escape from liberal hypocrisy.
Shit bro, you are trying way too hard. I admire the effort though...Negrophobe's views are all over the board. Even his name could be linked with racism and vaguely linked to bigotry. Anybody could see that.
And I'm probably getting lost again, but I don't recall saying there is no such thing as niggers. I was asking what your definition of the term was because the question you asked implied your definition was different to mine...And lol at 'get-out clause to escape from liberal hypocrisy'. You are looking into this shit more than I am!
Comments
You do know what a phobia is right?
Negrophobe
Maybe it's the sarcastic adoption of a name which reflects some peoples' assessment of his racial attitudes.
Hahaha, the image that comes to mind when I read your posts fits SO perfectly with your physiognomy. I find it astounding.
Ok I get it, my bad I exaggerated. Your views differ slightly from the given definition. It still included your definition in part. So your a 'racialist' not a 'racist'. Brilliant.
I even agree with you in part..'Example, whites are intellectually superior to negroes, yet negroes are in some areas athletically superior to whites (running).' I won't dispute that. Every race has different attributes, nobody should dispute that. I do think the rest of your stance is debatable though.
You haven't noticed the irony of your posts? Hah! Why did this not surprise me? Interesting to note, even. I wondered if you would... If you truly want I will quote it and spell it out for you , but I am too tired right now and it will make this a much larger post...
Now it's my turn...Excuse me if I don't enjoy your patronizing, condescending, self-conceited (I could go on) posts. I won't be kind when I...blah blah, yeah, that's not me. You sound like a douche. No offense :hai:
Likewise :thumbsup:
EDIT: And my bad if I sometimes like to poke people like you with a stick every now and then. I find the reactions entertaining...Damn I need some sleep.
I considered him and DS borderline trolls. It's good to see there is a more serious of the two.
Do you think you could spot the niggers in a crowd of black people?
[ame="
It's a perfectly reasonable question given that you're asserting a positive correlation between cranial structure and psychology/social behaviour.
Maybe this technique only applies to white people.
EDIT: I thought it was a funny question, given the thread. So I posted what I thought was an on topic response...I will refrain from any and all humorous/facetious activity from now on :thumbsup:
Apart from using it to assess Negrophobe, you never said anything about its general applicability at all; an enquiry about physiognomy's usage with regard to nigger-identification, given that niggers are the subject of this thread, is therefore entirely reasonable.
Your physiognomy-based sense of humour wearing thin now that it's occured to you that some black people bear a strong resemblance to great apes, relative to white people?
Honestly, I didn't think people would assume I think its 'generally applicable' from a single post I made concerning one person only...Good reasoning/assuming abilities, but you are assuming too much and are simply off the mark.
I guess we disagree on what we find reasonable. If I did hold the view and had stated that it was 'generally applicable', or at least made the claim more than once about more than one person, and shit, if this wasn't totse of all places, then I would agree it is perfectly reasonable...But as it stands, I haven't. I've even explained this already. Keep picking at what I said though, by all means.
Haha, I think you are taking this all a bit seriously/literally. My 'physiognomy-based sense of humour' isn't wearing thin at all in regard to negrophobe. I get an interesting and hilarious mental image when I link his picture to his posts. The part about 'suggesting stupidity, bigotry, ugliness etc' was just a crude troll to see what would happen. Call it a personal experiment. I also had a few of those opinions of him before seeing his picture, which inspired the post in the first place, aside from his amusing response to me calling him 'ugly'. For once somebody on totse actually looks like I imagined :eek:
If you had any idea you would realize I rarely ever get kicks out of 'physiognomy-based humour'. You are assuming way too much on my behalf and in the vein of negrophobe, 'doing yourself no favours'. Hope this cleared up some of your confusion :thumbsup:
And for the sake of this thread, no I couldn't. To my understanding the widely acceptable definition of a nigger is a derogatory term toward black people...
Yeah, I could probably pick out at least some of the niggers in a crowd of black people presuming you define nigger along some such lines as a 'debased, ignorant, or very low person' (crack heads aren't too hard to spot)...Or like how a nigger is portrayed in a show such as 'The Boondocks'...But this is delving into semantics. If you really care about my opinion on this feel free to post a more accurate definition. As I'm sure you're aware, definitions concerning nigger can differ rather dramatically depending on who you are talking to. Much like the word 'racist', as we've found out
I created a valid question in attempt to clarify your position precisely because I didn't make an assumption.
Nice strawman.
The strawman accusation of 'too much assumption' has been dealt with. As for doing one's self favours your sloppy condescension of Negrophobe has hardly been impressive.
Given the prevalence of inverted racism that plagues self-loathing liberals 'no such thing as niggers[insert semantics], but I can spot a white racist bigot', trolling, and in this case haughty moral condescension, is an ideal get-out clause to escape from liberal hypocrisy.
Seems I misinterpreted the tone of your posts. I wasn't trying to create a strawman. Sounded to me like you had the wrong impression.
I get it now, you were trying to clarify my position by asking a question, albeit a rather ambiguous one given the overall tone of the thread. I didn't think you were being serious. Is it so hard to just be direct and ask if I meant my statement as being 'generally applicable'? Or if it it was applicable to black people/niggers? Or even if you had posted your definition of 'nigger' because you obviously meant it as a separate term to black people. Would've saved us both some time.
As I already said, I'm not trying to do myself a 'favour' or even impress anybody. This is an internet forum, I actually have better things to do than impress/win approval from people here :eek: I post here because it amuses me when I have some spare time and occasionally I learn something.
I found the 'favour' remark funny when negrophobe used it as if I cared about what people on an internet forum think of me. So I found it amusing to use again.
Shit bro, you are trying way too hard. I admire the effort though...Negrophobe's views are all over the board. Even his name could be linked with racism and vaguely linked to bigotry. Anybody could see that.
And I'm probably getting lost again, but I don't recall saying there is no such thing as niggers. I was asking what your definition of the term was because the question you asked implied your definition was different to mine...And lol at 'get-out clause to escape from liberal hypocrisy'. You are looking into this shit more than I am!
The internet - serious business