So apparently I have PSL — Totseans

So apparently I have PSL

edited June 2011 in Life
Pussy Sucking Lips, according to some random 30 y/o women I met downtown I have 'em.... Anyone else suffer from this sweet condition? :D

Comments

  • NegrophobeNegrophobe Regular
    edited June 2011
    I'd take that as an insult. Now if women had the snatch of your average 8 year old and it didn't smell or secrete puss and blood, I could understand the appeal. Those holes are for fucking when you want it for your pleasure and making babies, that's it. Women hate sex, unless they have something to gain from it in exchange.
  • DaSkipperDaSkipper Regular
    edited June 2011
    Spoken like a true virgin ^
  • NegrophobeNegrophobe Regular
    edited June 2011
    Projected like a true pussy-whipped retard. It's pretty damn clear who that's directed to.
  • edited June 2011
    Well, I for one am inclined to take it as a compliment; the closer I am to a vag the better, as far as I'm concerned
  • NegrophobeNegrophobe Regular
    edited June 2011
    As if there's nothing more important in life :rolleyes:
  • edited June 2011
    Negrophobe wrote: »
    As if there's nothing more important in life :rolleyes:

    According to evolutionary psychology, there isn't
  • NegrophobeNegrophobe Regular
    edited June 2011
    There's a negative correlaton between fertility and intelligence, worldwide the trend is the same.

    The r/k strategy explains the phenomenon well. There are much more important things to be doing than having a frigid, vestigial cunt rule your life.
  • edited June 2011
    Negrophobe wrote: »
    There's a negative correlaton between fertility and intelligence, worldwide the trend is the same.

    The r/k strategy explains the phenomenon well. There are much more important things to be doing than having a frigid, vestigial cunt rule your life.

    you appear to be arguing against yourself...
  • NegrophobeNegrophobe Regular
    edited June 2011
    Forget it.
  • edited June 2011
    Whew... You're makin sense again; what a relief!
  • NegrophobeNegrophobe Regular
    edited June 2011
    You're an idiot. You really can tell that this site came from zoklet, sometimes :facepalm:
  • edited June 2011
    Negrophobe wrote: »
    You're an idiot. You really can tell that this site came from zoklet, sometimes :facepalm:

    Except that I never did :facepalm:
  • edited June 2011
    OP has been deceived, PSL stands for Puşcă Semiautomată cu Lunetă
  • StephenPBarrettStephenPBarrett Adviser
    edited June 2011
    I too have pussy sucking lips. It is an affliction that i am proud to acknowledge. Also, women do enjoy sex as much if not more than men. If you think they don't you're not doing it right.
  • edited June 2011
    OP has been deceived, PSL stands for Puşcă Semiautomată cu Lunetă

    What language is that? Slovenian?
  • JestAJestA Regular
    edited June 2011
    Negrophobe wrote: »
    You're an idiot. You really can tell that I came from zoklet, sometimes :facepalm:

    Fixd :o
  • edited June 2011
    What language is that? Slovenian?

    Romanian
  • NegrophobeNegrophobe Regular
    edited June 2011
    Except that I never did :facepalm:

    I never said you did, I said that you could tell this website came out of zoklet. It mainly attracts the same type of idiots who have terrible reading comprehension.
  • NegrophobeNegrophobe Regular
    edited June 2011
    Women do enjoy sex as much if not more than men. If you think they don't you're not doing it right.

    What is it with you morons pandering to feminist lies?

    http://www.observer.com/2008/media/women-prefer-internet-over-sex
    As if we didn't already know enough about the frigidity of women.

    As if we needed a study to tell us the obvious. According to Baumeister et. al. (2001), women have much lower sex drives than men:
    The sex drive refers to the strength of sexual motivation. Across many different studies and measures, men have been shown to have more frequent and more intense sexual desires than women, as reflected in spontaneous thoughts about sex, frequency and variety of sexual fantasies, desired frequency of intercourse, desired number of partners, masturbation, liking for various sexual practices, willingness to forego sex, initiating versus refusing sex, making sacrifices for sex, and other measures. No contrary findings (indicating stronger sexual motivation among women) were found. Hence we conclude that the male sex drive is stronger than the female sex drive. The gender difference in sex drive should not be generalized to other constructs such as sexual or orgasmic capacity, enjoyment of sex, or extrinsically motivated sex.
    http://psr.sagepub.com/content/5/3/242.abstract

    Women do not like sex, it is just means to an end, with men sex is the end itself. They only have sex if there is something in it for them in terms of social status, economics, power, their own self-esteem and any other reason other than having sex as a way of gaining pleasure. I posted in various threads the study which shows that a woman's orgasm is correlated to the size of a man's wallet. The reason rape is also not acceptable is because women do not enjoy sex, certainly not as much as men and I'd go as far as to say not at all. All women are frigid cunts. Women like misery, pain and suffering; this is why they like "tough guys", deep down. I've made multiple posts detailing the socio-economic use of the cunt, which females use it for.

    Good alternatives to sex are drugs such as alcohol, marijuana, cocaine and especially heroin. These drugs stimulate the pleasure centres. It is no coincidence most substance abuse is by males because we are predominantly pleasure-seekers. Rigorous exercise, extreme sports and heavy duty and a devotion to completing important work to success (more fun on cocaine/methamphetamine) are also forms of pleasure seeking.

    Males are basically pleasure-seekers. The primary sexual activity of the male is copulating. A major group of male sex substitutes satisfy the male's pleasure-seeking instincts. Males substitute for sex anything which builds up to a climax and is then resolved.

    The error being committed in this thread is a very old one; it is a fundamental confusion as to the distinction between having an extrinsic drive versus an intrinsic drive for sexual gratification. This is the same error committed by the Roman author Juvenal who, in his Satires, assumes that women are more lustful than men based on the deeds of a few prostitutes, which as I said earlier is done for economic reasons.

    Women are motivated to seek out sexual intercourse of course; but they will only have sex in exchange for things economically, such as fast cars, big houses, and cold hard cash, or power in the form of males with huge muscles, high levels of testosterone, and a penchant for violent criminality. Although women like and go with effeminate guys because they are more faithful, however what they have is not what they want, they will cheat on these effeminate men regularly and walk all over them until they get a man they want. As long as the female is receiving something in exchange for her sexual activity, she will enjoy sex immensely and often cannot do without (as I explained with the orgasm relating to the size of your wallet earlier); hence, the female enjoyment of sex is really the pleasure of receiving; it is the pleasure of being treated with economic resources.

    Men, on the other hand, are intrinsically motivated to seek out sexual intercourse; the male simply enjoys sex because of an innate biological impulse determined by the relative concentration of testosterone within the bloodstream. The fact that a substantial percentage of men will sleep with anything that breathes and moves and resembles a human female (this can be seen by the majority of males on zoklet fawning after just pictures of the females to jerk to- a mighty fine pathetic example can be seen throughout this entire LLR board, the picture thread and the my tits are good thread), which automatically means that all women, regardless of appearance or behaviour, are attractive to some large segment of the male population.

    The man needs nothing in exchange for sex, the woman on the other hand does not. No woman has sex for nothing, without being offered money or power in exchange for sex, sex is pointless to the female. This is what I mean when I say that all women are frigid creatures who hate sex.

    Here are some interesting reads;
    http://heretical.com/wilson/sfantasy.html
    http://heretical.com/wilson/fchoice.html

    The vast majority of women have virtually no interest in such things as masturbating to pornography, hiring male prostitutes for fun, picking up random men for sexual intercourse, being sexually aroused by fetishes or paraphilias, or even something as simple as merely fantasizing about sex. The only time women explore their sexuality is when they are being paid to do so, such as being offered a fast car, place to stay or money and presents in exchange for their efforts.

    Read that. Much of Glenn Wilson's research is interesting and competent about sex differences and sexuality. Just tells it how it is.

    http://www.gresham.ac.uk
    Search by speaker > Glenn D Wilson


    I've just come to the realization that there's much better things to do and get done than being hanged by the balls with your life revolving around pleasing a woman, society is becoming severely feminized and to the point where the woman has so much self-importance it's unhealthy. It's no coincidence that any man who ever made a difference and the finest thinkers of the past were misogynists. They had better ways to spend their time.
  • edited June 2011
    Negrophobe wrote: »
    What is it with you morons pandering to feminist lies?
    This.
    If women liked sex, I'd be an expensive prostitute because I can eat cunt better than any of the little boys in this thread
    It takes a tuff man to give a tender lickin'
  • NegrophobeNegrophobe Regular
    edited June 2011
    Here's a good excerpt from a piece by Simon Sheppard, it sums up my post much quicker and in simpler terms:
    Next, it is suggested that "There are women, who marry and settle down, have children and make a wonderful home, bring up our children to be decent respectable members of society" etc. The point here is that the woman, if she does it at all, is doing it for her own benefit. Suppose she is dutifully ironing her husband's shirts. In doing so she is gratifying herself by satisfying her instinct to mark her husband. True, the husband gets his shirts ironed, but in seeking to understand the underlying mechanisms we should not deceive ourselves that it is being done for his benefit. (This threatens to open a can of worms on the subject of altruism, and a discussion of whether true altruism exists or not, which I shall avoid.) Similarly when a woman makes a cosy nest of a family home – the husband's enjoyment of it is almost incidental. We can see this when an increasingly "female friendly" society, using male technology, allows the female to have almost all of the benefits without a "troublesome man" around who would formerly have been needed to pay for it all. Now, in an increasing number of cases, she simply does without him.

    All "good" features of women – besides the obvious biological ones, of furthering the race – are either the result of masculine influence or the expression of masculine traits (just as many males express feminine characteristics). I have yet to find an exception to this rule.
    http://heretical.com/sheppard/in-women.html
  • edited June 2011
    This.
    If women liked sex, I'd be an expensive prostitute because I can eat cunt better than any of the little boys in this thread
    It takes a tuff man to give a tender lickin'


    Looooool like you've ever been with a woman.


    Negrophobe wrote: »
    Here's a good excerpt from a piece by Simon Sheppard, it sums up my post much quicker and in simpler terms:


    http://heretical.com/sheppard/in-women.html

    Sometimes I can't tell if yous trollin', or if you're a very lonely doooood
  • NegrophobeNegrophobe Regular
    edited June 2011
    You manginas are like the same open book. Nor does it change the facts, regardless of how or why someone came to the solid conclusions. I'm going to request that you post on topic, unless you'd like a ban.
  • edited June 2011
    Negrophobe wrote: »
    You manginas are like the same open book. Nor does it change the facts, regardless of how or why someone came to the solid conclusions. I'm going to request that you post on topic, unless you'd like a ban.

    Whaddya mean? I made this thread solely for the purpose of questioning if yous trollin.
Sign In or Register to comment.