Home› Help and Suggestions

Child Porn

TLVTLV Regular
edited July 2010 in Help and Suggestions
Apparently fr0st_Byte says it's againt the rules to tag you threads with "Child Porn"

As seen here

http://www.totse.info/bbs/showpost.php?p=30099&postcount=5


What gives? Ive been doing this for the past week or so and he is the first person to say anything about it.
Share on Twitter

Comments

  • FingerBlasterFingerBlaster Regular
    edited July 2010
    it aint no fun if the homies can't have none
    Share on Twitter
  • Anal Probe DeluxeAnal Probe Deluxe Regular
    edited July 2010
    TLV wrote: »
    Apparently fr0st_Byte says it's againt the rules to tag you threads with "Child Porn"

    As seen here

    http://www.totse.info/bbs/showpost.php?p=30099&postcount=5


    What gives? Ive been doing this for the past week or so and he is the first person to say anything about it.

    hasn't that shit been a trollish tradition since &T?
    Share on Twitter
  • DailyDaily Regular
    edited July 2010
    Anal Probe Deluxe wrote: »
    hasn't that shit been a trollish tradition since &T?

    Haha, yeah, I remember CHILD PORN being the biggest phrase in tag search.
    Share on Twitter
  • ImaginariumImaginarium Regular
    edited July 2010
    ^^I thought it started on zoklet, and thus is part of zoklet faggotry, which seems like a good thing to outlaw.
    Share on Twitter
  • TLVTLV Regular
    edited July 2010
    Anal Probe Deluxe wrote: »
    hasn't that shit been a trollish tradition since &T?

    Thats my point. He is threatening to get my IP and ban me for something that has never been against the rules (even on zoklet) that is very common for someone to do. I think he just has a twig up his ass.

    Imaginarium wrote: »
    ^^I thought it started on zoklet, and thus is part of zoklet faggotry, which seems like a good thing to outlaw.

    Nope I used to do it on totse too, and even if it wasn't why ban it? totse is all about free speech and the words "child porn" are not illegal, hence hwy the should be banned.
    Share on Twitter
  • DfgDfg Admin
    edited July 2010
    Actually it isn't against the rules. I did this on Zoklet for ages and I still do it here from time to time. Google doesn't index using tags. They're mostly useless from that point of view. No one can be infracted NOR banned for it. However, if the section mod requests, you should at least keep this tag to SG and HB sections.

    He might be trying to protect Totse.

    Even if he wants to ban or infract, everything is on hold. The infraction list/ban points etc. I decided to delay it a bit to keep users/mods time to get a feel for it. Once they learn how to moderate without banning power, they will rely on it less.

    Also, the section rules are good for the time being, BUT all of this rules will be combined into one rule book with sections for each forum. In this way, mods can't make up rules and we will have a community approved rule list for everyone. Admin to user. No exceptions.


    Share on Twitter
  • ImaginariumImaginarium Regular
    edited July 2010
    Yeah, I'm sure frostbyte is just trying to protect the site, and not hammer on users. No need to start up mod hate so soon in the game.
    Share on Twitter
  • TLVTLV Regular
    edited July 2010
    Dfg wrote: »
    Actually it isn't against the rules. I did this on Zoklet for ages and I still do it here from time to time. Google doesn't index using tags. They're mostly useless from that point of view. No one can be infracted NOR banned for it. However, if the section mod requests, you should at least keep this tag to SG and HB sections.

    He might be trying to protect Totse.

    Even if he wants to ban or infract, everything is on hold. The infraction list/ban points etc. I decided to delay it a bit to keep users/mods time to get a feel for it. Once they learn how to moderate without banning power, they will rely on it less.

    Also, the section rules are good for the time being, BUT all of this rules will be combined into one rule book with sections for each forum. In this way, mods can't make up rules and we will have a community approved rule list for everyone. Admin to user. No exceptions.





    I've just been doing it for the hell of it, tagging my threads with how to make a bomb to.
    Share on Twitter
  • TLVTLV Regular
    edited July 2010
    Imaginarium wrote: »
    Yeah, I'm sure frostbyte is just trying to protect the site, and not hammer on users. No need to start up mod hate so soon in the game.

    Protect it from what? The internet police? It's not like I was posting child porn. I simply tagged the thread with "child porn" just as I did this one. Which does nothing but adds lulz to a user who finds it funny.
    Share on Twitter
  • LSA KingLSA King Regular
    edited July 2010
    If fr0st_byte sets the rules and guidelines for his forum (which all moderators should do if they haven't already or start working on it) and that is a no-go then so be it. Site wide it isn't against the rules of course but fr0st_byte obviously wants to focus on quality in BLTC instead of shenanigans. We've all seen how crazy BLTC got back in the old days. I remember the quality and one of the reasons I left was because of the shenanigans, flame wars, and spam amongst other things.
    Share on Twitter
  • DfgDfg Admin
    edited July 2010
    TLV wrote: »
    I've just been doing it for the hell of it, tagging my threads with how to make a bomb to.

    I tag my threads with dfg, I want to use child porn but I don't think it will give a good example for new users to follow. Plus, I use tags for indexing purposes. Makes it easier for me to point users to all my threads with the help of a single tag.

    try Dfg, child porn on Zoklet.
    Share on Twitter
  • ImaginariumImaginarium Regular
    edited July 2010
    ^^waaaaaaaaaaaaaaadaaaaaaaaaaa ;) (@LSAKing)
    Share on Twitter
  • DfgDfg Admin
    edited July 2010
    LSA King wrote: »
    If fr0st_byte sets the rules and guidelines for his forum (which all moderators should do if they haven't already or start working on it) and that is a no-go then so be it. Site wide it isn't against the rules of course but fr0st_byte obviously wants to focus on quality in BLTC instead of shenanigans. We've all seen how crazy BLTC got back in the old days. I remember the quality and one of the reasons I left was because of the shenanigans, flame wars, and spam amongst other things.

    I actually support this, no matter how many guidelines we create, they will always be general. With section based guidelines users will know the limits and behave and hence increase the quality of that section.
    Share on Twitter
  • TLVTLV Regular
    edited July 2010
    LSA King wrote: »
    If fr0st_byte sets the rules and guidelines for his forum (which all moderators should do if they haven't already or start working on it) and that is a no-go then so be it. Site wide it isn't against the rules of course but fr0st_byte obviously wants to focus on quality in BLTC instead of shenanigans. We've all seen how crazy BLTC got back in the old days. I remember the quality and one of the reasons I left was because of the shenanigans, flame wars, and spam amongst other things.

    Thats fine if he sets the rules. But not asking me to stop, telling me he is going to IP ban me for something I was never told not to do and isn't against the rules is a bit ridiculous.
    Share on Twitter
  • LSA KingLSA King Regular
    edited July 2010
    Imaginarium wrote: »
    ^^waaaaaaaaaaaaaaadaaaaaaaaaaa ;) (@LSAKing)



    I know it's completely out of charactor for me to say lol.
    Share on Twitter
  • DfgDfg Admin
    edited July 2010
    Man, I am tempted to sticky this.

    DAMMIT!

    I wanted to make a Child Porn thread on Totse 1st :(.

    inb4tonsofhits.
    Share on Twitter
  • TLVTLV Regular
    edited July 2010
    Dfg wrote: »
    Man, I am tempted to sticky this.

    DAMMIT!

    I wanted to make a Child Porn thread on Totse 1st :(.

    inb4tonsofhits.

    This thread will get hits for years to come.
    Share on Twitter
  • LuxJigabooLuxJigaboo Regular
    edited July 2010
    TLV wrote: »
    Protect it from what? The internet police? It's not like I was posting child porn. I simply tagged the thread with "child porn" just as I did this one. Which does nothing but adds lulz to a user who finds it funny.

    We must not rest until every thread has been tagged with Child Porn. :mad:
    Share on Twitter
  • fr0st_Bytefr0st_Byte Sumpin' c00L
    edited July 2010
    TLV wrote: »
    Protect it from what? The internet police? It's not like I was posting child porn. I simply tagged the thread with "child porn" just as I did this one. Which does nothing but adds lulz to a user who finds it funny.

    I was trying to protect the site from unwanted attention from people who can get a site shut down. Anything having to do with child porn draws bad attention.

    But I was just informed that the CP tags do not show up on google or anything, so I guess it's fine.

    But I mean whats the point in tagging a thread with child porn?
    Share on Twitter
  • da teachada teacha Regular
    edited July 2010
    If they're not indexed by Google, is there any point in keeping the tags?

    I'm pretty sure nobody really uses them for serious purposes.
    Share on Twitter
  • TLVTLV Regular
    edited July 2010
    fr0st_Byte wrote: »
    I was trying to protect the site from unwanted attention from people who can get a site shut down. Anything having to do with child porn draws bad attention.

    But I was just informed that the CP tags do not show up on google or anything, so I guess it's fine.

    But I mean whats the point in tagging a thread with child porn?

    For teh lulz?
    Share on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.