US humiliated by state dinner, China plays anti-american tune for Obama

ManifestoTHEOUManifestoTHEOU Acolyte
edited January 2011 in Spurious Generalities
http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/content/view/49822/
At the White House State dinner on Jan. 19, about six minutes into his set, Lang Lang began tapping out a famous anti-American propaganda melody from the Korean War: the theme song to the movie “Battle on Shangganling Mountain.”

The film depicts a group of “People’s Volunteer Army” soldiers who are first hemmed in at Shanganling (or Triangle Hill) and then, when reinforcements arrive, take up their rifles and counterattack the U.S. military “jackals.”

I keep telling people, China has a fuckin issue with America for many reasons but everyone is in denial - "oh china is reliant on america, they would never think of going to war or starting a conflict with us"

What do you call this? Lang lang playing anti-american tunes for Obama's state dinner. Hah! How about how when china announced to the world its stealth fighters?

I consider this, a very big insult to America and the pretext to war.

I gaurentee you the rest of the world thinks the same. You Americans can deny this all you want, because maybe deep down inside you dont want to go to war with the largest army in the world. Maybe because your being surpassed by china as an economic power. You dont think the chinese are going to take advantage of these strengths over the U.S.>? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

W/e I sincerely hope the best for you americans, its not like I have much favorance for china based on their failure to meet standard levels of human rights. I anticipate the diplomatic discourse that will follow.

Comments

  • Darth BeaverDarth Beaver Meine Ehre heißt Treue
    edited January 2011
  • edited January 2011
    I think China just wants us to know that they can fuck us up. If they ever actually went to war with us it would probably turn into WWIII for two reasons:

    A) a lot of countries do still rely heavily on the US, probably leading to a choosing of sides (axis vs. allies, etc)
    B) A mainland attack on the US would almost certainly lead to nuclear exchange
  • DirtySanchezDirtySanchez Regular
    edited January 2011
    It get's old having to explain to you idiots time and time again why China is not a real threat at this point. First of all yes they DO rely on us for economic reasons and a war with America would be a disaster for the PRC.

    Also remember that thanks to Nato a lot of country's by treaty are required to help us out in the event of war. Our technology and missile defense is vastly superior to the PRC and man power means very little in modern warfare.

    Don't forget that India would also jump on the chance to help us take out China and India has a comparable manpower to China. If China was really such a threat than why the hell haven't they kicked us out of Asia yet? The idea that America has a weakening military is fucking stupid.
  • proudclod9proudclod9 Regular
    edited January 2011
    It's MAD I tells ya.
  • edited January 2011
    It get's old having to explain to you idiots time and time again why China is not a real threat at this point. First of all yes they DO rely on us for economic reasons and a war with America would be a disaster for the PRC.

    Also remember that thanks to Nato a lot of country's by treaty are required to help us out in the event of war. Our technology and missile defense is vastly superior to the PRC and man power means very little in modern warfare.

    Don't forget that India would also jump on the chance to help us take out China and India has a comparable manpower to China. If China was really such a threat than why the hell haven't they kicked us out of Asia yet? The idea that America has a weakening military is fucking stupid.
    :facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:

    this

    If even DS can figure it out there's no reason OP can't.
  • -SpectraL-SpectraL Will Faggert
    edited January 2011
    I'm quite looking forward to the takeover of the United States by a foreign country. Once their country is finally in shambles - something they have been working very hard toward all these years through hypocritical, dishonest and criminal practices - somebody like the Chinese will simply be able to walk in and start claiming it all for their own. Americans have fucked up their country beyond repair, and have also irreversibly fucked up many other countries through their greed and dishonesty, so it's about time they get pushed off their little golden pedestals.
  • Darth BeaverDarth Beaver Meine Ehre heißt Treue
    edited January 2011
    -SpectraL wrote: »
    I'm quite looking forward to the takeover of the United States by a foreign country. Once their country is finally in shambles - something they have been working very hard toward all these years through hypocritical, dishonest and criminal practices - somebody like the Chinese will simply be able to walk in and start claiming it all for their own. Americans have fucked up their country beyond repair, and have also irreversibly fucked up many other countries through their greed and dishonesty, so it's about time they get pushed off their little golden pedestals.


    So what do you think would happen to Canada without America to protect it?
  • -SpectraL-SpectraL Will Faggert
    edited January 2011
    So what do you think would happen to Canada without America to protect it?
    This isn't a discussion about Canada, it's about America and the way the Chinese are gearing up to move into fertile territory.
  • RolfRolf Regular
    edited January 2011
    Such rubbish would never be allowed at a state dinner of Rolfheim, states Rolf, for mighty Rolf's blade would quickly decapitate any fool stupid enough to shame the hospitality of Rolf, states Rolf.
  • Darth BeaverDarth Beaver Meine Ehre heißt Treue
    edited January 2011
    -SpectraL wrote: »
    This isn't a discussion about Canada, it's about America and the way the Chinese are gearing up to move into fertile territory.

    Nice dodge, now answer the question. You are the one who alluded to China taking over America. As part of the topic of conversation if that happened where the fuck would that leave Canada?
  • edited January 2011
    I think if China conquered the United States that Canada would probably just chill and be like "yo we don't start shit, let's be trading partners". Mexico would probably try for annexation or at least buddy up to China.
  • DirtySanchezDirtySanchez Regular
    edited January 2011
    By the way Canada is also a member of NATO as far as I know so yes they would also be getting involved if America and China went to war.
  • -SpectraL-SpectraL Will Faggert
    edited January 2011
    Vineman wrote: »
    I think if China conquered the United States that Canada would probably just chill and be like "yo we don't start shit, let's be trading partners". ...
    You got it. That's exactly what we'd do. We live to get along, and we're not anything like the United States government, who deliberately goes sticking their nose into every single international nook and cranny just to see if it gets its nose bitten off yet. We just sit around and smoke dope all day and let the people of other countries their lives the way they want, and fuck it up if they want to, too. Our government already tried to stick their noses into this mess the United States "government" created, thinking they could "get a piece of the action and spoils", and they ended up getting a car door slammed on it. We're pulling just about everything out now, as well we should, thanks to some pretty heavy lobby group pushes.
  • Darth BeaverDarth Beaver Meine Ehre heißt Treue
    edited January 2011
    -SpectraL wrote: »
    You got it. That's exactly what we'd do. We live to get along, and we're not anything like the United States government, who deliberately goes sticking their nose into every single international nook and cranny just to see if it gets its nose bitten off yet. We just sit around and smoke dope all day and let the people of other countries their lives the way they want, and fuck it up if they want to, too. Our government already tried to stick their noses into this mess the United States "government" created, thinking they could "get a piece of the action and spoils", and they ended up getting a car door slammed on it. We're pulling just about everything out now, as well we should, thanks to some pretty heavy lobby group pushes.


    You are overlooking one thing.

    If you were planing on a land assualt against the U.S. would you try to establish a "beachead" in the US? Or would you pick a softer target like Canada and Mexico in order to give your troops a secure supply line to the front?

    That and you might think that Canada would just sit on their thumbs but I am sure your Government would react much differently and you know it.

    Of course this whole line of discussion might as well be a screenplay for Red Dawn II becasue it is never going to happen.
  • DirtySanchezDirtySanchez Regular
    edited January 2011
    -SpectraL wrote: »
    You got it. That's exactly what we'd do. We live to get along, and we're not anything like the United States government, who deliberately goes sticking their nose into every single international nook and cranny just to see if it gets its nose bitten off yet. We just sit around and smoke dope all day and let the people of other countries their lives the way they want, and fuck it up if they want to, too. Our government already tried to stick their noses into this mess the United States "government" created, thinking they could "get a piece of the action and spoils", and they ended up getting a car door slammed on it. We're pulling just about everything out now, as well we should, thanks to some pretty heavy lobby group pushes.

    :facepalm: Like I said Canada as well as a lot of other nations are in NATO. Learn how alliances work and you may change your tune on the whole US vs China thing.
  • -SpectraL-SpectraL Will Faggert
    edited January 2011
    :facepalm: Like I said Canada as well as a lot of other nations are in NATO. Learn how alliances work and you may change your tune on the whole US vs China thing.
    It used to be called the League of Nations, yet another version of a completely failed and disgraced kangaroo court.
  • edited January 2011
    You are overlooking one thing.

    If you were planing on a land assualt against the U.S. would you try to establish a "beachead" in the US? Or would you pick a softer target like Canada and Mexico in order to give your troops a secure supply line to the front?

    That and you might think that Canada would just sit on their thumbs but I am sure your Government would react much differently and you know it.

    Of course this whole line of discussion might as well be a screenplay for Red Dawn II becasue it is never going to happen.

    This. Literally. Word for word. TDR we may disagree often and vocally but on this issue you are 110% correct. In fact one could almost say this thread needs you more than you need it :rolleyes:.
  • edited January 2011
    -SpectraL wrote: »
    It used to be called the League of Nations, yet another version of a completely failed and disgraced kangaroo court.

    You are confusing NATO and the United Nations, which are two very different organizations anyone with an inkling of sense can differentiate between. Congratulations on demonstrating once again how you do not fall into that category.
  • Darth BeaverDarth Beaver Meine Ehre heißt Treue
    edited January 2011
    -SpectraL wrote: »
    It used to be called the League of Nations, yet another version of a completely failed and disgraced kangaroo court.


    You really are losing it over here at Totse Spectral. The League of Nations had nothing to do with NATO? NATO was formed well after the League of Nations was defunct and the League of Nations was replaced by the United Nations not NATO.
  • -SpectraL-SpectraL Will Faggert
    edited January 2011
    You are confusing NATO and the United Nations, which are two very different organizations anyone with an inkling of sense can differentiate between. Congratulations on demonstrating once again how you do not fall into that category.
    To me it's all the same thing. NATO, League of Nations, United Nations... all it is is a puppet front where we show everybody how well everybody is getting along, but in reality all these international delegations are is more fluff and mirrors. It's a dead, lifeless, ineffective, powerless collection of criminals and backstabbers, and you can put whatever name you want on it, but that does nothing to change the animal itself. Save your your tunnel-vision for someone who doesn't give a shit about labels.
  • DirtySanchezDirtySanchez Regular
    edited January 2011
    -SpectraL wrote: »
    It used to be called the League of Nations, yet another version of a completely failed and disgraced kangaroo court.

    :facepalm: It's already been said but I'll state it again that the League of Nations became the United Nations after world war 2. The League of Nations was about keeping peace not an alliance.

    NATO is a military alliance. More comparable to the triple entente in WW1 or the Allies in WW2. All country's in NATO have a duty to mutually defend other nations In NATO in the event of an attack.
  • edited January 2011
    -SpectraL wrote: »
    To me it's all the same thing. NATO, League of Nations, United Nations... all it is is a puppet front where we show everybody how well everybody is getting along, but in reality all these international delegations are is more fluff and mirrors. It's a dead, lifeless, ineffective, powerless collection of criminals and backstabbers, and you can put whatever name you want on it, but that does nothing to change the animal itself. Save your your tunnel-vision for someone who doesn't give a shit about labels.

    Neat!
    9tbSP.jpg
  • Darth BeaverDarth Beaver Meine Ehre heißt Treue
    edited January 2011
    :facepalm: It's already been said but I'll state it again that the League of Nations became the United Nations after world war 2. The League of Nations was about keeping peace not an alliance.

    NATO is a military alliance. More comparable to the triple entente in WW1 or the Allies in WW2. All country's in NATO have a duty to mutually defend other nations In NATO in the event of an attack.


    He already knows that DS he is just being purposely obtuse.
  • -SpectraL-SpectraL Will Faggert
    edited January 2011
    ...All country's in NATO have a duty to mutually defend other nations In NATO in the event of an attack.
    Yes, and the Tooth Fairy is also real. So is Santa Clause. Anything else?
  • edited January 2011
    -SpectraL wrote: »
    Yes, and the Tooth Fairy is also real. So is Santa Clause. Anything else?
    These rather pathetic derailment and obscuring attempts are what have already placed you on my list of users to be banned when Dfg passes the torch.

    Back on topic please.
  • angryonionangryonion Just some guy
    edited January 2011
    I wonder how the Chinese would have reacted if we did something similar?
    We are their bitch and they just let us know it.
  • DirtySanchezDirtySanchez Regular
    edited January 2011
    angryonion wrote: »
    I wonder how the Chinese would have reacted if we did something similar?
    We are their bitch and they just let us know it.

    Great another moron who buys into media scare tactics:facepalm:
  • angryonionangryonion Just some guy
    edited January 2011
    Great another moron who buys into media scare tactics:facepalm:

    Don't be such dick head,I'm not "buying" into anything.It was just a simple question.
    You know dam well we do not have the balls too pull that shit.
  • Darth BeaverDarth Beaver Meine Ehre heißt Treue
    edited January 2011
    angryonion wrote: »
    Don't be such dick head,I'm not "buying" into anything.It was just a simple question.
    You know dam well we do not have the balls too pull that shit.


    With strength comes self confidence. Think of it like this, if someone was being a little dick and you knew you could wipe them off the earth would you waste your prestige in the eyes of everyone else by doing so or would you just let them run their moth and bury themselves without any help from you?

    Now I know a lot of younger guys will say fuck the little loud mouth I am gonna fuck his day. But with age comes wisdom and the best way to win, as Sun Tsu said, is to win without fighting. The best way to win without fighting is to let your adversary defeat themselves.
  • edited January 2011
    angryonion wrote: »
    Don't be such dick head,I'm not "buying" into anything.It was just a simple question.
    You know dam well we do not have the balls too pull that shit.

    What do you care Mr. Anarcho-Socialist flag avatar. You don't even believe in Nationalism.
  • angryonionangryonion Just some guy
    edited January 2011
    What do you care Mr. Anarcho-Socialist flag avatar. You don't even believe in Nationalism.

    You assume too much FuckFace.
    Answer the question.
  • edited January 2011
    angryonion wrote: »
    You assume too much FuckFace.
    Answer the question.

    You're not the boss of me
  • -SpectraL-SpectraL Will Faggert
    edited January 2011
    You're not the boss of me
    Take your bullshit somewhere's else, faggit. Thanks.
  • edited January 2011
    Nice dodge, now answer the question. You are the one who alluded to China taking over America. As part of the topic of conversation if that happened where the fuck would that leave Canada?

  • Darth BeaverDarth Beaver Meine Ehre heißt Treue
    edited January 2011
  • DirtySanchezDirtySanchez Regular
    edited January 2011
    -SpectraL wrote: »
    Take your bullshit somewhere's else, faggit. Thanks.

    Stop derailing the thread:mad:
  • -SpectraL-SpectraL Will Faggert
    edited January 2011
  • DirtySanchezDirtySanchez Regular
    edited January 2011
    -SpectraL wrote: »

    The problem here is that you seem to derail every thread you enter. Either that or you make the thread into a conspiracy against yourself. I won't discuss this any further in here. Feel free to make a Bitch and moan thread about how I signaled you out in a vast conspiracy which all of totse is in on.
  • -SpectraL-SpectraL Will Faggert
    edited January 2011
    The problem here is that you seem to derail every thread you enter. Either that or you make the thread into a conspiracy against yourself. I won't discuss this any further in here. Feel free to make a Bitch and moan thread about how I signaled you out in a vast conspiracy which all of totse is in on.
    But for Fatty, it's OK to derail. I see. Alrighty then. I'll move to the bitching forum now. Thanks for the errrr... clarity.
  • edited January 2011
    -SpectraL wrote: »
    I'm quite looking forward to the takeover of the United States by a foreign country. Once their country is finally in shambles - something they have been working very hard toward all these years through hypocritical, dishonest and criminal practices - somebody like the Chinese will simply be able to walk in and start claiming it all for their own. Americans have fucked up their country beyond repair, and have also irreversibly fucked up many other countries through their greed and dishonesty, so it's about time they get pushed off their little golden pedestals.

    My bet is that the U.S. will change it's politics (For the better) as the number of South Americans and hispanic immigrants increases. So will the food.
Sign In or Register to comment.