I've been looking over gunbroker.com for well priced Smith and Wesson m-629 .44 magnum revolver.
I have never owned a gun, and the little I know about the laws around them has come from researching it the last few weeks.
I'm about a week and a half away from being 23, and I only need to be 21 to own a handgun.
I apparently need to pass a test to get a handgun license--this is California state enforced, I believe.
I'll need to arrange a local dealer to receive the gun, prior to purchase.
So am I missing anything?
Where can I take the test to get the handgun license?
How much fee's should I be expecting to pay for the test, the transactions, and anything I might not be thinking of?
Thanks gentlemen.
Comments
EDIT: You take the test at the local Police Department, if you're in a Township you have to go to the County Sheriff. The most they can charge you for it is up to $5, but most don't.
http://www.jgsales.com/product_info.php/handguns/makarov/p/bulgarian-makarov-9x18%2C-w-holster-very-good-condition/cPath/16_151/products_id/4118
http://certguns.doj.ca.gov/safeguns_resp.asp
I'll head to the police department for that test as soon as I can. I read the license is good for five years.
Thank you very much for this information. I'll keep it in mind, even though I'm pretty set on getting a 44 magnum.
I'm not especially worried about the hoops I have to jump through, just trying to figure out what they are so I can do the jumping.
California get's it's rap for banning "assault rifles," and assault rifle like qualities. 30 round mag, easily detachable mag, bayonet lug, colapsable stock. Etc.
Check your local ordinances though. Some cities may ban handguns as Chicago has, I'm not sure which do and do not.
I'm aware of the assault rifle laws, and what's classified as one. It's pretty disappointing. I really wanted an Armalite AR-180.
"The State's DROS fee is $19.00 which covers the costs of the background checks and transfer registry. There is also a required $1.00 Firearms Safety Testing fee and a $5.00 Safety and Enforcement fee."
"How do I get an HSC?
You may obtain an HSC by passing the DOJ HSC test administered by a DOJ Certified Instructor.
(PC sections 12800 - 12809)"
I know that I definitely want a revolver as my first gun, and I was going to go with a S&W .357, but the .44 just kinda stuck in my mind. I've found they also chamber lever-action rifles in .44, which I also intend to purchase when I gather the cash.
My ultimate plan is to have a pistol and rifle that use the same ammunition, then start going hunting with my friend's dad and shooting at the range with my brother-in-law.
I would have gotten a smaller caliber, but I didn't want to risk not being able to hunt anything specific. As I've read, a .44 is capable of handling all North American game, so I will not have to worry about under-kill.
The ammo will be a bit more expensive than something with a specific purpose, but will make up for it in being able to handle any given situation.
I like the simplicity of one single round fitting in either of the guns I hope to own.
It would also be fun to learn how to reload my own shells--again, something I'm sure I can do with smaller calibers, but .44 has just stuck with me.
Would an instructor be located at my police station? I think I read that some gun shops offer the test, but it was kinda vague.
This is not me, I NEVER post as a guest.
It was probably posted by Dirty Sanchez. He's mad at me because I said bad things bout his welfare rifles.
Rolf agrees with fatty, a .22 is always a good choice choice for starting off, states Rolf, once said thou is more experienced, then thou can spend the money on a more expensive firearm and ammunition, states Rolf. Rolf remembers the first rifle of Rolf, given to Rolf by the grandfather of Rolf, a Stirling in .22 Magnum and is still good for shootin pesky wrabbits when Rolf has the time to go shootin pesky wrabbits, states Rolf.
Rolf dislikes wrabbits, for they always run from the claymore of Rolf, a shame it is that Rolf must revert to the rifle to shoot said wrabbits, states Rolf. But not really, states Rolf, fencing is only fun when one has an opponent that fights back, states Rolf, unlike shooting, finishes Rolf.
That would be pretty classy. :thumbsup:
This.
If you really want to get a .44 magnum don't pay extra just for the S&W stamped on the side. Raging Bulls are almost as good, you can spend part of the difference on a trigger job and still have enough left over for quite a few boxes of ammo.
Or a reloading kit.
This doesn't need to be a discussion on which gun I'm getting. I'm just trying to sort out all the details on how to get one.
http://crime.about.com/od/gunlawsbystate/p/gunlaws_ca.htm
Any use?
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=213370115
I'm out of town at the moment and won't be able to pick it up yet, but that is the gun I've bought. I may have over-payed, but I am very happy with this--of course I won't be able to give a proper opinion until I actually have the gun, but I have talked with the seller a good deal and feel he's on the level.
it just need some niger blood under its belt.
Bullshit. The .308 is superior to 30/06. It's the more accurate round and is almost exactly the same power wise.
Incorrect states Rolf, nothing beats a .303, especially if it's being fired from a Jungle Carbine, proclaims Rolf.
It should decrease recoil and muzzle jump, but the general consensus is people aren't very impressed with the results--most are more concerned about the gases injuring or damaging things not directly in the path of the gun. I have no intention in using it for self-defense, and will only really shoot it in controlled environments, so the chances of the port unintentionally directed at a person will be minimal.
I don't like the idea of it making the gun louder, but a gun's going to be loud no matter what. :rolleyes:
I am glad you pointed it out, though. I'm always happy to learn more about this gun. If there's anything I missed about port-hole that I should know, please let me know. :thumbsup: