The protocols of the learned elders of Zion
SLIM
Regular
I'll be honest, The Protocols truly do make my skin crawl.
http://sharebee.com/73048eb2
It makes me laugh how they always say it's a forgery. A forgery of what, motherfucker?
Not to mention, it's fitting exactly what has been happening over the past years all that time ago and is still going on, and appearing to become more and more complete.
Here's a good article about this so called "forgery", take it with a pinch of salt in some parts but it is interesting:
Other than the talmud it should be a big smack in the face enough, or ATLEAST a call to be on guard and vigilant. The protocols was my true awakening to the jewish problem (which is a problem- the biggest 3 problems being religion, government and political correctness), then I read the talmud and it confirmed it all.
There's been speak of part of the protocols being taken out. Ben Klassen had brought up in Nature's Eternal Religion, some good food for thought. That the creation and use of the fictional christianity and christian "morals" is a big plan to use against gentiles. To confuse and weaken them. Where as the old testement was used to unite the jews. I myself believe this to be true.
Nilus was a priest, he may have taken that section out as to not harm the following in his church.
Nature's eternal religion is a must read, although it is completely misunderstanding of what anarchism actually is and is too pro-government/conservative in some places; other than that it's a good read.
Politics and "morals" have been rooted in religion as long as I can remember. A big part of the collapse of the roman empire was the bundling of christianity upon it, as with most other countries.
http://sharebee.com/73048eb2
It makes me laugh how they always say it's a forgery. A forgery of what, motherfucker?
Not to mention, it's fitting exactly what has been happening over the past years all that time ago and is still going on, and appearing to become more and more complete.
Here's a good article about this so called "forgery", take it with a pinch of salt in some parts but it is interesting:
Maurice Joly Plagiarized "Protocols of Zion" (not vice-versa)
July 30, 2008
joly1.jpg(image: Maurice Joly 1821-1879)
By Henry Makow Ph.D.
It is forbidden to mention the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" (1905) without the Disclaimer that, of course, they are a "forgery" of Maurice Joly's "Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu" (1864.)
The assumption is that since Protocols appeared some 40 years after Dialogue, it plagiarized the earlier work. But I will suggest that Protocols actually predated Dialogue and Joly borrowed from it. In other words, far from being an anti-Semitic ruse, the "Protocols of Zion" are authentic.
I have already argued that the two documents are neither similar nor derivative, although they have some lines and words in common. "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" is essentially a brilliant Master Plan for tyranny, i.e. the New World Order. It is the key to understanding our present predicament. (This is not a condemnation of all Jews, only the nucleus of bankers and high-level Masons directing this diabolical war against the human race.)
"Dialogue in Hell" was a veiled Masonic Jewish attack on Napoleon III, an example of how they championed liberalism to undermine the Old Order and usurp power, as described in the Protocols themselves. (The author of Protocols is contemptuous of liberalism and all egalitarian programs. They are just gimmicks to manipulate the masses.)
Reading Kerry Bolton's monograph "The Protocols of Zion In Context" (Renaissance Press, 2003) it became obvious that Joly was plagiarizing from The Protocols and not vice-versa.
Joly, a Jew whose real name was Joseph Levy, was a lifelong Mason and member of the "Lodge of Mizraim" where the Protocols document originated. He was the protege of Adolph Cremieux (Isaac Moise Cremieux 1796-1880) the head of the lodge and a Minister in the Jewish-backed government of Leon Gambetta.
The plot is described in the Protocols as "centuries-old." It most likely predates "Dialogue." Joly was well versed in the Protocols and borrowed from it to flesh out the unpopular authoritarian position of Machiavelli, which he ascribed to Napoleon III.
Joly, who committed suicide in 1879, was in the habit of "borrowing." He is accused of plagiarizing a popular novel by Eugene Sue, namely "Les Mystères du Paris." (1845) Also his work is predated by another of Cremieux's proteges, Jacob Venedy, entitled, "Machiavelli, Montesquieu, Rousseau." (1850)
In 1884 Mme. Justine Glinka, the daughter of a Russian General living in Paris, hired Joseph Schorst, a member of Joly's Mizraim Lodge to obtain sensitive information. For the sum of 2500 francs, Schorst provided Glinka with "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion." He was subsequently tracked down and murdered in Egypt.
The Tsarist government, already heavily infiltrated, sat on the document. Glinka subsequently gave it to a friend who passed it on to Professor Sergius A. Nilus who published it for the first time in 1901.
After the Bolshevik Revolution, Nilus was arrested in Kiev in 1924 ,imprisoned and tortured. The President of the Court told him he had "done them incalculable harm in publishing the Protocols." ("Waters Flowing Eastward" by Paquita de Shishmareff, 1999, pp.74-76.)
CONCLUSION
If your plan for World Domination leaked out, what would you do? Would you admit it? "You got me! My bad!"
No, you'd employ an army of ciphers to convince everyone the document is a hoax motivated by "prejudice" and "anti-Semitism." They have executed this "damage control" perfectly, a measure of their power to deceive even in the presence of the truth.
This is the only Conspiracy that has prevailed in spite of the Blueprint being freely available. It demonstrates the credulity (or venality) of the intelligentsia and the masses.
They have colonized our minds first. We cannot name our oppressor for fear of being accused of "anti-Semitism." It's as though Black slaves working on cotton plantations were taught it was "racist" or "prejudiced" to mention the White slave driver. Since the majority of Jews are ignorant of this plot, and are manipulated like everyone else, racism is a ploy to divert attention from a very dire problem.
The Illuminati (top-rung Masonic Jews and their non-Jewish allies) have distributed some wealth and power to the masses (liberalism, socialism) as a way of securing ultimate power for themselves. According to the Protocols, they will eventually withdraw these benefits once their "invisible government" is invincible. The "war on terror" should be seen in this context.
In my view, "Protocols Deniers" are complicit in this Conspiracy, which is responsible for most human suffering and will lead to a great deal more. As a Jew, I don't want this responsibility on my head, or on other innocent Jews or Masons.
Other than the talmud it should be a big smack in the face enough, or ATLEAST a call to be on guard and vigilant. The protocols was my true awakening to the jewish problem (which is a problem- the biggest 3 problems being religion, government and political correctness), then I read the talmud and it confirmed it all.
There's been speak of part of the protocols being taken out. Ben Klassen had brought up in Nature's Eternal Religion, some good food for thought. That the creation and use of the fictional christianity and christian "morals" is a big plan to use against gentiles. To confuse and weaken them. Where as the old testement was used to unite the jews. I myself believe this to be true.
Nilus was a priest, he may have taken that section out as to not harm the following in his church.
Nature's eternal religion is a must read, although it is completely misunderstanding of what anarchism actually is and is too pro-government/conservative in some places; other than that it's a good read.
Politics and "morals" have been rooted in religion as long as I can remember. A big part of the collapse of the roman empire was the bundling of christianity upon it, as with most other countries.
Comments
derp
:facepalm::facepalm: