zomg where will i get my bavarian cream now? :(:(:(
I got yer bavarian cream right here.:fap::fap::fap:here watch me fill a donut with it, owwww, still hot, fuck, note to self, allow donuts to cool before penetrating. Poor big bear, I bet he is eating a big plate of foie gras pate and wondering whose mouth to shit into now.
When to the temple a member of the order posts on the dark side intending only harm. Then they, exiled for the good of the jedi order, must be. Yeesssssss.
I don't agree with the banning of this member > Yoda.
Could you look into this, Dfg? As far as I know, as long as they are on topic they're fine, no matter how they want to express themselves. This is not a flooding, IMO.
I don't agree with the banning of this member > Yoda.
Could you look into this, Dfg? As far as I know, as long as they are on topic they're fine, no matter how they want to express themselves. This is not a flooding, IMO.
I don't agree with the banning of this member > Yoda.
Could you look into this, Dfg? As far as I know, as long as they are on topic they're fine, no matter how they want to express themselves. This is not a flooding, IMO.
Read his post and then tell me what it has to do with National Socialism?
I'm not butthurt at all by yoda. What he posted had nothing to do with the thread and if stupid shit like what is allowed in the serious forums than I'm done making threads in humanities religion or politics. There is no point in making threads in those sections if stupid shit like that is allowed.
Off topic posting is not on topic. It's simple. Spectral derailed my thread.
The thread title here speaks of injustice, and I'd say this is a case for one. Yoda's posts may be annoyingly written, but if you think about them, they are actually on topic. Only spammers should be banned.
If he's a sock puppet, then OK.. I can see a legitimate ban.
The thread title here speaks of injustice, and I'd say this is a case for one. Yoda's posts may be annoyingly written, but if you think about them, they are actually on topic. Only spammers should be banned.
If he's a sock puppet, then OK.. I can see a legitimate ban.
Tell me what his post had to do with National Socialism and I'll agree.
The thread title here speaks of injustice, and I'd say this is a case for one. Yoda's posts may be annoyingly written, but if you think about them, they are actually on topic. Only spammers should be banned.
If he's a sock puppet, then OK.. I can see a legitimate ban.
This thread is obviously about Big Bear +POZ+. You derailed it. Make a new thread.
Comments
I got yer bavarian cream right here.:fap::fap::fap:here watch me fill a donut with it, owwww, still hot, fuck, note to self, allow donuts to cool before penetrating. Poor big bear, I bet he is eating a big plate of foie gras pate and wondering whose mouth to shit into now.
Louis Cypher
A local bus stations glory hole ?????
Could you look into this, Dfg? As far as I know, as long as they are on topic they're fine, no matter how they want to express themselves. This is not a flooding, IMO.
So, what your saying is, you are/were yoda.
Read his post and then tell me what it has to do with National Socialism?
What have you done?
I thought you said you could resist.
Also, if you must ban him, then ban him for multiple accounts.
I'm not butthurt at all by yoda. What he posted had nothing to do with the thread and if stupid shit like what is allowed in the serious forums than I'm done making threads in humanities religion or politics. There is no point in making threads in those sections if stupid shit like that is allowed.
Here is another question that I think Dfg should look into:
Should moderators be allowed to moderate outside of their forums?
I do not think that they should be allowed to do so, (that is why we have global moderators) except in certain circumstances. Discuss.
If he's a sock puppet, then OK.. I can see a legitimate ban.
Tell me what his post had to do with National Socialism and I'll agree.
So, in short this whole thread is moot. Now stop bitching about derailed threads.