monotoned wrote: » Will you please explain the apostrophes before the s ( blah's) and behind the s (blahs') ?
Pacino wrote: » wot is grammer
da teacha wrote: » Blah's dog = the dog which belongs to Blah Blahs' dog = the dog which belongs to Blahs When an object's name ends in 's', you do not need to put another 's' after the apostrophe: an apostrophe on its own will do. Another example in the difference of usage would be: The trees' leaves = the leaves which belong to ALL the trees in the forest. The tree's leaves = the leaves which belong to ONE tree in the forest. Make sense?
Mantikore wrote: » does "mo' money" mean "more money" or "no money"
Comments
Blah's dog = the dog which belongs to Blah
Blahs' dog = the dog which belongs to Blahs
When an object's name ends in 's', you do not need to put another 's' after the apostrophe: an apostrophe on its own will do.
Another example in the difference of usage would be:
The trees' leaves = the leaves which belong to ALL the trees in the forest.
The tree's leaves = the leaves which belong to ONE tree in the forest.
Make sense?
sumfin dat trollfacez lyk u dnt uze. gtfo.
Got it! thx
Is a grammatically valid sentence.
Mo' money is niggerspeak for "more money" which in turn is niggerspeak for "I ain't got no money for rocks" which in turn means "I cannot afford crack" in plain English.