LOL Im banned from stormfront

DirtySanchezDirtySanchez Regular
edited October 2010 in Spurious Generalities
I haven't been on there site in a long time but I just went to check it and discovered Im banned. Apparently I'm a "Jewish neoconservative troll". They mad because I said we should kill Nuke Iran and the middle east and steal there oil.:facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:

Comments

  • MayberryMayberry Regular
    edited October 2010
    It's ok, you can say that stuff here now.
  • edited October 2010
    It's in vogue to pretend to care about the moslems now. Back around 9/11 they were the filthiest scum on Earth some many on Stormfront suggest aligning with the Jews against them. Tides change.
  • DirtySanchezDirtySanchez Regular
    edited October 2010
    It's in vogue to pretend to care about the moslems now. Back around 9/11 they were the filthiest scum on Earth some many on Stormfront suggest aligning with the Jews against them. Tides change.

    I went from supporting Islams in a way because they hated Israel to seeing that Muslims are actually worse then Jews.
  • SLIMSLIM Regular
    edited October 2010
    You're better off without stormfront, trust me. It's full of disinfo agents, revleft trolls and feds in general. VNN is a bit better, and they don't take kindly to that CI bullshit ;)

    I posted a list of hypocrisies with stormfront with my other account on this site (CatchMeIfYouCan) in a thread in B and M a while back.
  • DirtySanchezDirtySanchez Regular
    edited October 2010
    SLIM wrote: »
    You're better off without stormfront, trust me. It's full of disinfo agents, revleft trolls and feds in general. VNN is a bit better, and they don't take kindly to that CI bullshit ;)

    I posted a list of hypocrisies with stormfront with my other account on this site (CatchMeIfYouCan) in a thread in B and M a while back.

    You cant even have a swastika in your avatar there now:facepalm:
  • SLIMSLIM Regular
    edited October 2010
    You cant even have a swastika in your avatar there now:facepalm:

    That's "white nationalism" for you. It always made me laugh and cringe that "white nationalists" used national socialist material to help their cause. Too many CONservatives on there too.
  • SLIMSLIM Regular
    edited October 2010
    spazz wrote: »
    well thats strange for a white supremacy website:confused:

    Save it with the buzzwords.
  • DirtySanchezDirtySanchez Regular
    edited October 2010
    SLIM wrote: »
    That's "white nationalism" for you. It always made me laugh and cringe that "white nationalists" used national socialist material to help their cause. Too many CONservatives on there too.

    If thats white nationalism then I feel like a retard for ever calling myself one. Fuck that.
  • MayberryMayberry Regular
    edited October 2010
    If thats white nationalism then I feel like a retard for ever calling myself one. Fuck that.

    Why be a follower? Start your own radical movement :hai:
  • DirtySanchezDirtySanchez Regular
    edited October 2010
    Mayberry wrote: »
    Why be a follower? Start your own radical movement :hai:

    I have my own beliefs I just always saw "white nationalism" as the best word to describe myself but now I'm starting to think I'm too radical for that movement. They also seem to fear what the big bad jew will think of them as well. Hitler would've had these pussys on the cattle cars headed to Auschwitz.
  • SLIMSLIM Regular
    edited October 2010
    If thats white nationalism then I feel like a retard for ever calling myself one. Fuck that.

    That's what I was telling you on zoklet. Honestly man, I'm just looking out for a white brother when I criticize you, I just don't hold back. It is my most honest and humble opinion and I can only but try to show and tell you how religion, even the "racialized" versions, is the cancer enslaving the white race and holding it back from its natural instincts. It's my honest opinion that David Duke is a fraud and not trustworthy and I've shown and given you examples why. Yes he speaks the truth on some things but there are others who do too and are much better at it. Do you honestly think they'd let a white racist in any high authoritive power, even if he did get the vote?

    You should know they'll reject it, the ballot box time is finished, over.

    National-socialists, national-bolshevists/communists I have my differing political ideologies with, but when it's crunch time I won't ask the person beside me fighting the enemy if he's a red or even if he or she's a christian, I'll just want them to kill the enemy too.
  • SLIMSLIM Regular
    edited October 2010
    I have my own beliefs I just always saw "white nationalism" as the best word to describe myself but now I'm starting to think I'm too radical for that movement. They also seem to fear what the big bad jew will think of them as well. Hitler would've had these pussys on the cattle cars headed to Auschwitz.

    That's what I mean. It's hard to even describe myself as a national anarchist sometimes, but if you had to label me that's the closest. I choose a lot of ideals of anarchism because it's in accordance with the laws of nature and more to the point it's radical. What works for the white race is good for it, anarchism opposes all the oppression against our race.
  • DirtySanchezDirtySanchez Regular
    edited October 2010
    Well I gotta say you were right on the stormfront thing. I'm opposed to Anarchism but I'm watching those videos you sent and reading up on it some more because I can't really intelligently debate you on it until I learn some more about it. And I'd rather debate facts then hurl insults. Even Duke is starting to piss me off with how he always goes on about Israel and thats good and well but then try's to act as though Islam is somehow friendly:facepalm:
  • SLIMSLIM Regular
    edited October 2010
    Well I gotta say you were right on the stormfront thing. I'm opposed to Anarchism but I'm watching those videos you sent and reading up on it some more because I can't really intelligently debate you on it until I learn some more about it. And I'd rather debate facts then hurl insults. Even Duke is starting to piss me off with how he always goes on about Israel and thats good and well but then try's to act as though Islam is somehow friendly:facepalm:

    That's good that you're looking into it. If you've any questions then feel free to ask, I won't flame you over it. I'll actually look forward to our debates about religion though ;) I feel that's the main problem with the world, as well as its mentality it puts into people.

    Lol, us national-anarchists get a lot of schtick from politically correct, bubble gum chewing "anarchists" who hypocritically say you can't be racist and an anarchist; well says who, them, who are they to dictate? Most of them honestly haven't properly read any of Bakunin, Proudhon or Max Stirner's stuff. I adhere mainly to Proudhon's stuff, especially his economic idea of mutualism.

    Stirner is opposed to nationalism, but not in the way meant by national anarchists, and I like his stuff on egoism/individualism. But of course small doses of collectivism are natural too.


    I'm telling you though man, religion as a whole needs to be flushed down the fucking toilet. I want the muslims and kikes to kill each other off.
  • DirtySanchezDirtySanchez Regular
    edited October 2010
    I actually need to Brush up on Bakunin. I haven't read his stuff in years. Emma Goldman is who gave me my horrible impression of Anarchy. I might be wrong on this but didnt Karl Marx envision communism as a means to eventually reach a Utopian anarchist state?
  • SLIMSLIM Regular
    edited October 2010
    I actually need to Brush up on Bakunin. I haven't read his stuff in years. Emma Goldman is who gave me my horrible impression of Anarchy. I might be wrong on this but didnt Karl Marx envision communism as a means to eventually reach a Utopian anarchist state?

    Anarcho-communism is the end goal of most sincere marxists I've met, who are unfortunately Trotskyites and anti-racists; the national-communists in East Germany and the National Bolsheviks in Russia aren't hard to get along with though.

    Anarcho-communism is the end goal of Marxism. It needs to begin in the modern industrialized West, as stated by Marx for that though. My opinion is that communism was never meant to be multicultural or for mud races, Marx was too much of a racist for that.


    Proudhon's ideas are more free from any marxist ideals, however.


    Here are the basic principles of anarchism;
    II. Replacing the cult of God by respect and love of humanity, we proclaim human reason as the only criterion of truth; human conscience as the basis of justice; individual and collective freedom as the only source of order in society.

    III. Freedom is the absolute right of every adult man to seek no other sanction for their acts than their own conscience and their own reason, being responsible first to themselves and then to the society which they have voluntarily accepted.

    IV. It is not true that the freedom of one man is limited by that of other men. Man is really free to the extent that his freedom, fully acknowledged and mirrored by the free consent of his fellowmen, finds confirmation and expansion in their liberty. Man is truly free only among equally free men; the slavery of even one human being violates humanity and negates the freedom of all.

    V. The freedom of each is therefore realizable only in the equality of all. The realization of freedom through equality, in principle and in fact, is justice.

    VI. If there is one fundamental principle of human morality. it is freedom. To respect the freedom of your fellowman is duty; to love, help, and serve him is virtue.

    VII. Absolute rejection of every authority including that which sacrifices freedom for the convenience of the state. Primitive society had no conception of freedom; and as society evolved, before the full awakening of human rationality and freedom, it passed through a stage controlled by human and divine authority. The political and economic structure of society must now be reorganized on the basis of freedom. Henceforth, order in society must result from the greatest possible realization of individual liberty, as well as of liberty on all levels of social organization.

    VIII. The political and economic organization of social life must not, as at present, be directed from the summit to the base –the center to the circumference–imposing unity through forced centralization. On the contrary, it must be reorganized to issue from the base to the summit–from the circumference to the center–according to the principles of free association and federation.
    Bakunin's revolutionary catechism.


    http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/bakunin/catechism.html
    (the end is a bit marxist sounding)

    http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/proudhon/Proudhonarchive.html
  • DirtySanchezDirtySanchez Regular
    edited October 2010
    I do agree with the survival of the fittest thing in certain situations. For example some guy kills a woman he should be killed but lets say for example 2 guys are in a bar and they get into a fight. One man dies well the killer should not be charged because it was mutual combat and the other man was weak. Or when drunk drivers die. I say they deserved it for driving drunk. Hell if I cross a street and get hit I deserved it because I should have been more aware. Another example is organized crime. If someone accepts a loan and dosnt pay there shouldn't be charges because they knew what there doing. In that way the laws of nature still work but innocent people wont be killed for no reason. I hate the fact that we have laws that protect the stupid and incompetent.
  • edited October 2010
    I do agree with the survival of the fittest thing in certain situations. For example some guy kills a woman he should be killed but lets say for example 2 guys are in a bar and they get into a fight. One man dies well the killer should not be charged because it was mutual combat and the other man was weak. Or when drunk drivers die. I say they deserved it for driving drunk. Hell if I cross a street and get hit I deserved it because I should have been more aware. Another example is organized crime. If someone accepts a loan and dosnt pay there shouldn't be charges because they knew what there doing. In that way the laws of nature still work but innocent people wont be killed for no reason. I hate the fact that we have laws that protect the stupid and incompetent.

    There's a difference between reasonable social darwinism, such as the two men in a bar, and OMG SO XTREME ANURKEY of assholes like SLIM.
  • SLIMSLIM Regular
    edited October 2010
    There's a difference between reasonable social darwinism, such as the two men in a bar, and OMG SO XTREME ANURKEY of assholes like SLIM.

    Oh and you're the overall judge of what is "reasonable social darwinism" now?
  • AltindAltind Regular
    edited October 2010
    2wacist4stormfront
  • SLIMSLIM Regular
    edited October 2010
    Altind wrote: »
    2wacist4stormfront
    Being too racist for stormfront is really not a hard thing to achieve.
  • AltindAltind Regular
    edited October 2010
    SLIM wrote: »
    Being too racist for stormfront is really not a hard thing to achieve.

    totz :o
  • 13371337 Regular
    edited October 2010
    I haven't been on there site in a long time but I just went to check it and discovered Im banned. Apparently I'm a "Jewish neoconservative troll". They mad because I said we should kill Nuke Iran and the middle east and steal there oil.:facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:

    Maybe they just don't like incorrect grammar. :o
  • edited October 2010
    SLIM wrote: »
    Oh and you're the overall judge of what is "reasonable social darwinism" now?

    Not everywun is a hardcor tuff guy liek yuo :(:(:(:( :eek::eek::eek::eek::p:p:p:p:fap::fap::fap::fap:
  • SLIMSLIM Regular
    edited October 2010
    Not everywun is a hardcor tuff guy liek yuo :(:(:(:( :eek::eek::eek::eek::p:p:p:p:fap::fap::fap::fap:

    Yeah, shame about that, init?
Sign In or Register to comment.