They all deserve to be show or at least sent to Africa to live with the niggers they love so much. Their entire philosophy is based on feelings of white guilt and guilt in general. Ted Kaczynski better known as the Una Bomber summed it up perfectly imo. Keep in mid by leftist I'm referring to the "Social Marxist" ways of most modern liberals that would make Karl Marx and all true great revolutionary's spin in their grave. These people are just as bad as capitalists. I think every limp wristed politically correct liberal that has hijacked the Left needs to be publicly executed.
9. The two psychological tendencies that underlie modern leftism we call "feelings of inferiority" and "oversocialization." Feelings of inferiority are characteristic of modern leftism as a whole, while oversocialization is characteristic only of a certain segment of modern leftism; but this segment is highly influential.
Feelings of Inferiority
10. By "feelings of inferiority" we mean not only inferiority feelings in the strictest sense but a whole spectrum of related traits: low self-esteem, feelings of powerlessness, depressive tendencies, defeatism, guilt, self-hatred, etc. We argue that modern leftists tend to have such feelings (possibly more or less repressed) and that these feelings are decisive in determining the direction of modern leftism.
11. When someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is said about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) we conclude that he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. This tendency is pronounced among minority rights advocates, whether or not they belong to the minority groups whose rights they defend. They are hypersensitive about the words used to designate minorities. The terms "negro," "oriental," "handicapped" or "chick" for an African, an Asian, a disabled person or a woman originally had no derogatory connotation. "Broad" and "chick" were merely the feminine equivalents of "guy," "dude" or "fellow." The negative connotations have been attached to these terms by the activists themselves. Some animal rights advocates have gone so far as to reject the word "pet" and insist on its replacement by "animal companion." Leftist anthropologists go to great lengths to avoid saying anything about primitive peoples that could conceivably be interpreted as negative. They want to replace the word "primitive" by "nonliterate." They seem almost paranoid about anything that might suggest that any primitive culture is inferior to our own. (We do not mean to imply that primitive cultures ARE inferior to ours. We merely point out the hypersensitivity of leftish anthropologists.)
12. Those who are most sensitive about "politically incorrect" terminology are not the average black ghetto-dweller, Asian immigrant, abused woman or disabled person, but a minority of activists, many of whom do not even belong to any "oppressed" group but come from privileged strata of society. Political correctness has its stronghold among university professors, who have secure employment with comfortable salaries, and the majority of whom are heterosexual, white males from middle-class families.
13. Many leftists have an intense identification with the problems of groups that have an image of being weak (women), defeated (American Indians), repellent (homosexuals), or otherwise inferior. The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They would never admit it to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is precisely because they do see these groups as inferior that they identify with their problems. (We do not suggest that women, Indians, etc., ARE inferior; we are only making a point about leftist psychology).
14. Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men.
http://www.davesag.com/unabomber/2leftism.html
Comments
Even though I disagree with most of the things you decide to share, I do agree with the concept of white guilt and how useless it is. It is really prominent in American society though, the idea of feeling sorry for races that we find inferior. If you've seen Avatar, total white guilt flick.
Isn't that only Fox news (And their ilk) who says stuff like that?
The white race reached its zenith around 1904 - after that, although we did gain more, we never gained at the rate we did. Some would argue this was down to the lack of available territories to conquer, however, we could have gone on and taken everything.
A mindset developed amongst the upper middles classes that we had gone too far and had abused our natural ability to solve problems. I would argue we should have exploited this ability - other races still expliot their natural talents and feel no guilt what so ever.
Individuals lacked the drive to reach their full potential - the overlords of the savages - and due to self turmoil and social embaracement proposed the idea of white guilt to make those who reached potential some how feel guilty (a useless emotion in the persuit of perfection) and to turn the minds of the general population.
We still have a lot of people that strive for this perfection. It is more than a coincidence that Nietzsche developed the idea and classification of the Übermensch. It is strange and ironic that feudalism and monarchy relied on god to control, capitalism allowed people to worship the god they wanted but the ideas of marx and his followers totaly rejected a higher being.
Ironic in that he ideas of marx came about before Nietzsche's idea that 'god is dead, man makes the rules', however, the ideals of marx were not put into practice before the 'god is dead' idea could be espoused and then bastardised to 'god never existed and if he did, he is of no relevence'.
Only once white ethics were smashed like a pair of jeans in a tumbler with rocks could socialism take off. Take away all that is known (holy) and a man shall follow - not only did men follow a false ideal, they turned on everything that was great about themselves.
It could be a subconciouse thing - an affront to god by wasting a talent he bestowed - is it not a sin to waste a god given tallent? - a test if you will, of the ultimate insecurity - Am I Bigger Than God?
By not believing (or knowing of his existence - and yes, god can only be a man, or part man and as such a man, but that is a different discussion) in god, man must reject everything holy - belief in ones own abilities and the sniping of the abilities of others being a foundation that was set out to be destroyed.
White guilt came about because some whites did not have the balls to go out and grab the world by the throat and found it easier to deride the actions of those that could.
However, this greatness does come with flaws of charecter, but these should be ignored. By some happy accident, the white male brain 'suffers' with autism more than any other race. Autism is a way of selling snake oil to those that do not want singlemindedness within society.
We only need look at two of the greatest men ever to walk the planet (both of recent times, this is why I chose to mention them), Rhodes and Churchill to see why people who have as much backbone as old lettuce feel insecure - they were men with flaws, but they were more than made up for in the brilliance they displayed.
Trotsky rejected judaism stop being a dumbass:facepalm:
I'm gonna reject my race.
Seriously.
Jews are white.
No liberals are a bastardized form of the left and have nothing to do with Socialism.
Their are similarities abut also large differences between the 2. I consider myself far from a liberal.
*jumps to cover in DS-proof bunker*
Can I join? I gots cookies and semen
You can't even keep your story straight. Worst troll ever.
So obviously you have nothing to counter my point that they are white and instead you call me a troll. I have a problem with religious Jews but racially they are white so an Atheist Jew such as Trotsky is not a problem. Below is a study on their DNA
http://ethnicgenome.wordpress.com/2009/03/03/mapping-out-the-borders-of-whiteness/
Thanks for your useless post:rolleyes: