http://gizmodo.com/5810109/tennessee-just-made-offensive-online-pictures-illegalhttp://www.mobiledia.com/news/93218.htmlhttp://tvnz.co.nz/technology-news/us-state-bans-offensive-images-4218527
Jesus, man. -- Oh wait, that'd be blasphemy.
Fucking shit, man. -- Nope, probably can't have pictures of that either.
I guess the Bible Belt is being used to whip the constitution one more time. IMHO this is one of the more ridiculous times. Granted, the real danger is the law doesn't say much about what 'offensive' means. If only Uma Thurman was was in court on this one.
Comments
This.
We need to support internet freedom.
Lets disgust the inbred bastards.
Major flaw!
Edit: If anyone wants to send the people who voted for this an email, then feel free
I have phone and fax #s but that may be infringing on the PI rules. Could take a vote. I don't fancy getting assraped though
Ok, point taken.
However, say if I were to post info of someone at, say, my place of education? They aren't a member, but if I got into a fight and then went "have fun" and posted it.
Still applies?
This one's for you Tennessee.
No actually, I used it as an example. Same could be said for any situation :facepalm: